Originally published via Armageddon Prose Substack:
“Here comes an avalanche of [Climate Change™] bullshit.” -Marla Singer
John Kerry at Davos: ‘No one politician’ can resist Climate Change™ policy
“If you wound up with a different President who was opposed to climate crisis, I got news for you. No one politician anywhere in the world can undo what is happening now…The only issue for all of us is not whether or not we can get or will get to a low carbon, no carbon economy globally. We will. The only question is, will we get there in time to meet the challenge of the scientists in order to avoid the worst consequences of this crisis. That is what is at stake.”
-John Kerry, ‘Special Presidential Envoy for Climate’
Mind you, John Kerry’s “climate office” hoovers up $4.3 million in taxpayer money every year (well, technically, it’s just piled onto the national debt, but in theory taxpayer money) in order to ferry him around the globe on private jets giving the finger to the American voter.
And America started a war with King George over tea tax. Bathe in the juxtaposition.
Obviously, the non-domestic-terrorist interpretation of Kerry’s words is that dismissing out of hand the policy preferences of a duly elected leader in a “democracy” is in no way contradictory to the elites’ professed deep and abiding appreciation for Democracy™.
Only a white supremacist would see any cognitive dissonance there.
Another totalitarian Davos girl, Naomi Oreskes, issued a similar pledge to clamp down on any dissent related to the war on carbon, the essential building block of life.
Via TIME:
“It will be crucial to build on the framework established in the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act to accelerate the transition to renewable energy. This will include opposing infrastructure that will lock in fossil-fuel energy for decades to come and carbon capture and storage projects that are adjuncts to fossil-fuel production. It will also be crucial not to allow new forms of denial to take hold. We are already seeing examples, such as the false claim that off-shore wind kills whales and that restrictions on gas stoves are the latest excuse by liberals to control our lives and deny our freedom. Scientists will have to work with climate activists to block the spread of such misleading narratives.”
What the lady meant to say was “government censors” will be necessary to censor dissenting views, but the euphemisms “scientists” and “climate activists” have a much more palatable ring to them for the liberals she appeals to.
If these people were barred from speaking in euphemisms, they wouldn’t be allowed to say anything at all.
WHO announces full-tilt jihad against farmers
WHO is now officially at war with farmers — as in, the people who own and operate farms and use them to grow the food that sustains the human population on planet Earth, the suppression of which would be literally genocidal.
Here’s the diverse WHO executive Tedros on shutting down food production for Climate Change™:
“Our food systems are harming the health of people and planet. Food systems contribute to over 30% of greenhouse gas emissions, and account for almost one third of the global burden of disease. Transforming food systems is therefore essential.”
Via United Nations:
“Food is now firmly on the menu as a vital area of action to achieve global climate goals and countries have led the way- challenging themselves to do more, faster. The key COP28 outcomes represent a collective commitment to integrated action for food systems and climate, and provide powerful advocacy tools to drive forward action which delivers on these commitments at all levels. Though this is a huge step forward- we are still only at the start of the journey. While food systems action made monumental leaps within COP28 proceedings, the integration of nutrition considerations within this remains a vital area for joint advocacy. The phrase echoing through nutrition discussions was “a glass half full” – with the groundwork laid for integrated action, but much more work to do to integrate nutrition considerations into country NDCs and NAPs, and deliver on the vision of food systems for people, planet and prosperity.
Focus now turns to transforming this momentum into measurable results*, with the 2024 COP29 in Azerbaijan and 2025 COP30 in Brazil serving as critical progress checkpoints. In line with their unique mandates, UN-Nutrition Members and partners stand ready to support countries in this mission, including championing healthy diets from sustainable food systems as a solution to achieve multiple Sustainable Development Goals and global climate targets. An exciting platform for this will be the scale up of the I-CAN initiative which is set to continue inspiring integrated action for climate and nutrition and monitoring change across food, health, social protection and water systems, as well as commencing country case studies for accelerated progress in 2024. Stay tuned!”
*“Measurable results” is yet another euphemism for “curtailed food production.”
This is how these social engineering schemes always unfold:
- The Experts™ publish dubious research manufacturing the problem and creating the narrative to underscore its urgency
- Various NGOs and unelected multinational corporate state governing bodies (like the WHO and UN), via controlled media, promulgate the narrative, referencing The Science™ and prescribing fixes that always, conveniently, centralize power and control into smaller and smaller sets of hands
- Said fixes to the manufactured dilemma — as we saw with the gradual banning of gas stoves for Climate Change™ in certain blue jurisdictions — are first said to not exist and derided as “conspiracy theory,” then acknowledged but framed as theoretical, then they are marketed as practical but voluntary, then shoved down the throats of the public through force of law once any will to resist has been exhausted in enough of the population to make it manageable
Climate Change™ scientists: Home gardening is destroying the planet
Via The Telegraph:
“Growing your own food in an allotment may not be as good for the environment as expected, a study suggests.
The carbon footprint of homegrown foods is five times greater than produce from conventional agricultural practices, such as rural farms, data show.
A study from the University of Michigan looked at how much CO2 was produced when growing food in different types of urban farms and found that, on average, a serving of food made from traditional farms creates 0.07kg of CO2.
The impact on the environment is almost five times higher at 0.34kg per portion for individual gardens, such as vegetable patches or allotments…
Fruit was found to be 8.6 times more eco-friendly when grown conventionally compared to in a city, whereas vegetables were 5.8 times better for the environment when left to the professionals.”
The cryptically referenced “professionals” here are satanic multinational corporations like Monsanto hellbent on:
- patenting nature down to the DNA level so that you’ll pay them to grow anything to feed your family
- running all independent agricultural operations out of business
- destroying the integrity of the soil, poisoning the food supply, and driving chronic disease for the benefit of the biomedical industry through monoculture, pesticides, insecticides, etc. so that nothing but their mutant corn will grow
A real bang-up job the “professionals” have been doing.
Here’s the cited study, so brazenly flawed and biased in its methodology that it doesn’t even factor in the transportation costs in terms of carbon consumption of growing, for example, Franken-soy in China and then shipping it halfway across the world in a freighter for peasants in Seattle or Santiago, whose farms have all been shuttered for the Earth.
Ben Bartee, author of Broken English Teacher: Notes From Exile, is an independent Bangkok-based American journalist with opposable thumbs.
Follow his stuff Substack. Also, keep tabs via Twitter.
For hip Armageddon Prose t-shirts, hats, etc., peruse the merch store.
Insta-tip jar and Bitcoin public address: bc1qvq4hgnx3eu09e0m2kk5uanxnm8ljfmpefwhawv
